Copycat Suicide
Copycat crime
Copy Cat
Suicide A spike of emulation suicides after a widely publicized suicide is known as the Werther effect, following Goethe's novel The Sorrows of Young Werther.[1] The publicized suicide serves as a trigger, in the absence of protective factors, for the next suicide by a susceptible or suggestible person. This is referred to as suicide contagion.[2] They occasionally spread through a school system, through a community, or in terms of a celebrity suicide wave, nationally. This is called a suicide cluster.[2] Suicide clusters are caused by the social learning of suicide-related behaviors, or "copycat suicides". Point clusters are clusters of suicides in both time and space, and have been linked to direct social learning from nearby individuals.[3] Mass clusters are clusters of suicides in time but not space, and have been linked to the broadcasting of information concerning celebrity suicides via the mass media.[4] To prevent this type of suicide, it is customary in some countries for the media to discourage suicide reports except in special cases. History One of the earliest known associations between the media and suicide arose from Goethe's novel Die Leiden des jungen Werthers (The Sorrows of Young Werther). Soon after its publication in 1774, young men began to mimic the main character by dressing in yellow pants and blue jackets. In the novel, Werther shoots himself with a pistol after he is rejected by the woman he loves, and shortly after its publication there were reports of young men using the same method to kill themselves in an act of hopelessness.[5] This resulted in the book being banned in several places. Hence the term "Werther effect", used in the technical literature to designate copycat suicides.[6] The term was coined by researcher David Phillips in 1974, two centuries after Goethe's novel was published.[7] Reports in 1985 and 1989 by Phillips and his colleagues found that suicides and other accidents seem to rise after a well-publicized suicide.[5] Demographic factors People who are young or old – but not middle-aged – seem to be most susceptible to this effect.[8] Due to the effects of differential identification, the people who attempt to copy a suicidal act tend to have the same age and gender as the triggering suicide.[8] Timing These suicidal actions tend to happen in the days and sometimes weeks after a suicide is announced.[8] In exceptional cases, such as a widely discussed suicide by a celebrity, an increased level of thinking about suicide may persist for up to one year.[8] Factors in suicide reporting Copycat suicide is mostly blamed on the media. "Hearing about a suicide seems to make those who are vulnerable feel they have permission to do it," Phillips said. He cited studies that showed that people were more likely to engage in dangerous deviant behavior, such as drug taking, if someone else had set the example first.[3] The Werther effect not only predicts an increase in suicide, but the majority of the suicides will take place in the same or a similar way as the one publicized. The more similar the person in the publicized suicide is to the people exposed to the information about it, the more likely the age group or demographic is to die by suicide. The increase generally happens only in areas where the suicide story was highly publicized.[5] Upon learning of someone else's suicide, some people decide that action may be appropriate for them as well, especially if the publicized suicide was of someone in a similar situation as them. Publishing the means of suicides, romanticized and sensationalized reporting, particularly about celebrities, suggestions that there is an epidemic, glorifying the deceased and simplifying the reasons all lead to increases in the suicide rate. People may see suicide as a glamorous ending, with the young person or elderly person getting a lot of attention, lots of sympathy, and lots of national concern that they never got in life. The second possible factor is that vulnerable youth may feel like, "If they couldn't cut it, neither can I".[9] Increased rate of suicides has been shown to occur up to ten days after a television report.[10] Studies in Japan[11] and Germany[12] have replicated findings of an imitative effect. Etzersdorfer et al.[13] in an Austrian study showed a strong correlation between the number of papers distributed in various areas and the number of subsequent firearm suicides in each area after a related media report. Higher rates of copycat suicides have been found in those with similarities in race,[11] age, and gender[1] to the victim in the original report. Stack[14] analyzed the results from 42 studies and found that those measuring the effect of a celebrity suicide story were 14.3 times more likely to find a copycat effect than studies that did not. Studies based on a real as opposed to fictional story were 4.03 times more likely to uncover a copycat effect and research based on televised stories was 82% less likely to report a copycat effect than research based on newspapers. Other scholars have been less certain about whether copycat suicides truly happen or are selectively hyped. For instance, fears of a suicide wave following the death of Kurt Cobain never materialized in an actual increase in suicides.[15] Furthermore, there is evidence for an indirect Werther effect, i.e. the perception that suicidal media content influences others which, in turn, can concurrently or additionally influence one person's own future thoughts and behaviors.[16] Similarly the researcher Gerard Sullivan has critiqued research on copycat suicides, suggesting that data analyses have been selective and misleading, and that the evidence for copycat suicides are much less consistent than suggested by some researchers.[17] Many people interviewed after the suicide of a relative or friend have a tendency to simplify the issues; their grief can lead to their minimizing or ignoring significant factors. Studies show a high incidence of psychiatric disorders in suicide victims at the time of their death with the total figure ranging from 98%[18] to 87.3%[19] with mood disorders and substance abuse being the two most common. These are often undiagnosed or untreated and treatment can result in reductions in the suicide rate. Reports that minimize the effect of psychiatric disorders contribute to copycat suicides whereas reports that mention this factor and provide help-line contact numbers and advice for where sufferers may gain assistance can reduce suicides. Social proof model An alternate model to explain copycat suicide, called "social proof" by Cialdini,[20] goes beyond the theories of glorification and simplification of reasons to look at why copycat suicides are so similar, demographically and in actual methods, to the original publicized suicide. In the social proof model, people imitate those who seem similar, despite or even because of societal disapproval. This model is important because it has nearly opposite ramifications for what the media ought to do about the copycat suicide effect than the standard model does.[citation needed] To deal with this problem, Alex Mesoudi of Queen Mary University, London, developed a computer model of a community of 1000 people, to examine how copycat suicides occur. These were divided into 100 groups of 10, in a model designed to represent different levels of social organization, such as schools or hospitals within a town or state. Mesoudi then circulated the simulation through 100 generations. He found the simulated people acted just as sociologists' theory predicted. They were more likely to die by suicide in clusters, either because they had learned this trait from their friends, or because suicidal people are more likely to be like one another.[21] Journalism codes Various countries have national journalism codes which range from one extreme of, "Suicide and attempted suicide should in general never be given any mention" (Norway) to a more moderate, "In cases of suicide, publishing or broadcasting information in an exaggerated way that goes beyond normal dimensions of reporting with the purpose of influencing readers or spectators should not occur." The study's author, University of London psychologist Alex Mesoudi, recommends that reporters follow the sort of guidelines the World Health Organization and others endorse for coverage of any suicide: Use extreme restraint in covering these deaths—keep the word "suicide" out of the headline, don't romanticize the death, and limit the number of stories.[22] Photography, pictures, visual images or film depicting such cases should not be made public" (Turkey).[23] While many countries do not have national codes, media outlets still often have in-house guidelines along similar lines. In the United States, there are no industry-wide standards. A survey of in-house guides of 16 US daily newspapers showed that only three mentioned the word suicide, and none gave guidelines about publishing the method of suicide. Craig Branson, online director of the American Society of News Editors (ASNE), has been quoted as saying, "Industry codes are very generic and totally voluntary. Most ethical decisions are left to individual editors at individual papers. The industry would fight any attempt to create more specific rules or standards, and editors would no doubt ignore them."[23] Guidelines on the reporting of suicides in Ireland were introduced recently which attempt to remove any positive connotations the act might have (e.g. using the term "completed" rather than "successful" when describing a suicide attempt which resulted in a death).[citation needed] The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation's journalistic standards and practices manual discourages the reporting of the details of suicide.[24] Journalist training Australia is one of the few countries where there is a concerted effort to teach journalism students about this subject. The Mindframe national media initiative[25] followed an ambivalent response by the Australian Press Council to an earlier media resource kit issued by Suicide Prevention Australia and the Australian Institute for Suicide Research and Prevention. The UK-based media ethics charity MediaWise provides training for journalists on reporting suicide and related issues.[26] Headline is Ireland's media monitoring programme for suicide and mental health issues, set up by Shine and the Health Service Executives National Office for Suicide Prevention as part of 'Reach Out: National Strategy for action on Suicide Prevention.' Headline works with media professionals and students to find ways to collaborate to ensure that suicide, mental health and mental illness are responsibly covered in the media and provides information on reporting on mental health and suicidal behavior, literature and daily analysis of news stories. Headline also serves as a vehicle for the public to become involved in helping to monitor the Irish media on issues relating to mental health and suicide. Prevention The Papageno effect is the effect that mass media can have by presenting non-suicide alternatives to crises. It is named after a lovelorn character, Papageno, from the 18th-century opera The Magic Flute. This character was contemplating suicide until other characters showed him a different way to resolve his problems.[8] There is more research into the damage done by "irresponsible media reports" than into the protective effects of positive stories, but when newspapers refuse to publicize suicide events or change the way that they provide information about suicide events, the risk of copycat suicides declines.[8] Examples Examples of celebrities whose suicides have triggered suicide clusters include Ruan Lingyu, the Japanese musicians Yukiko Okada, Miyu Uehara and hide, and Marilyn Monroe, whose death was followed by an increase of 200 more suicides than average for that August month.[2] Another famous case is the self-immolation of Mohamed Bouazizi, a Tunisian street vendor who set himself on fire on December 17, 2010, an act that was a catalyst for the Tunisian Revolution and sparked the Arab Spring, including several men who emulated Bouazizi's act. The TV show "13 Reasons Why", a TV show about a girl who committed suicide and left tapes for those who were the cause behind her death, also created a copycat suicide when a 23-year-old boy committed suicide by jumping off a balcony and leaving tapes for those who were behind his suicide. References 1.^ Jump up to: a b Schmidtke A, Häfner H (1988). "The Werther effect after television films: new evidence for an old hypothesis". Psychol Med. 18 (3): 665–76. PMID 3263660. doi:10.1017/s0033291700008345. 2.^ Jump up to: a b c Halgin, Richard P.; Susan Whitbourne (January 2006). Abnormal Psychology with MindMap II CD-ROM and PowerWeb. McGraw-Hill. p. 62. ISBN 0-07-322872-9. 3.^ Jump up to: a b Golman, D (1987-03-18). "Pattern of Death: Copycat Suicides among Youths.". 1987. New York Times. Retrieved April 21, 2011. 4.Jump up ^ Mesoudi, A (2009). "The Cultural Dynamics of Copycat Suicide.". PLoS ONE. 4 (9): e7252. PMC 2748702?Freely accessible. PMID 19789643. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0007252. 5.^ Jump up to: a b c Meyers, David G. (2009). Social Psychology (10th Ed). New York: McGraw Hill. ISBN 978-0-07-337066-8. 6.Jump up ^ "Preventing suicide: A report for media professionals" (PDF). World Health Organization. 2000. Retrieved 2007-06-09. 7.Jump up ^ De Wyze, Jeannette (2005-03-31). "Why Do They Die?". San Diego Reader. Retrieved 2008-02-05. 8.^ Jump up to: a b c d e f Sisask, Merike; Värnik, Airi (2017-01-04). "Media Roles in Suicide Prevention: A Systematic Review". International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 9 (1): 123–138. ISSN 1661-7827. PMC 3315075?Freely accessible. PMID 22470283. doi:10.3390/ijerph9010123. 9.Jump up ^ Mulvihill, G (2010). "Experts Fear Copycat Suicides After Bullying Cases. Experts fear a spate of copycat suicides after bullying cases grab national headlines.". ABC News. Retrieved April 21, 2011. 10.Jump up ^ Phillips, David P. (May 1982). "The Impact of Fictional Television Stories on U.S. Adult Fatalities: New Evidence on the Effect of the Mass Media on Violence". The American Journal of Sociology. 87 (6): 1340–59. doi:10.1086/227596. 11.^ Jump up to: a b Stack S (1996). "The effect of the media on suicide: evidence from Japan, 1955-1985". Suicide Life Threat Behav. 26 (2): 132–42. PMID 8840417. 12.Jump up ^ Jonas K (1992). "Modelling and suicide: a test of the Werther effect". Br J Soc Psychol. 31 (4): 295–306. PMID 1472984. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1992.tb00974.x. 13.Jump up ^ Etzersdorfer E, Voracek M, Sonneck G (2004). "A dose-response relationship between imitational suicides and newspaper distribution". Arch Suicide Res. 8 (2): 137–45. PMID 16006399. doi:10.1080/13811110490270985. 14.Jump up ^ Stack S (2002). "Media coverage as a risk factor in suicide". Inj. Prev. 8 Suppl 4: IV30–2. PMC 1765497?Freely accessible. PMID 12460954. 15.Jump up ^ Jobes D.; Berman A.; O'Carroll P.; Eastgard S. (1996). "The Kurt Cobain suicide crisis: Perspectives from research, public health and the news media". Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior. 26 (3): 260–271. 16.Jump up ^ Scherr, S.; Reinemann, C. (2011). "Belief in a Werther effect. Third-Person effects in the perceptions of suicide risk for others and the moderating role of depression". Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior. 41 (6): 624–634. doi:10.1111/j.1943-278X.2011.00059.x. 17.Jump up ^ Sullivan, G. (2007). Should Suicide Be Reported in the Media? A Critique of Research. Remember me: Constructing immortality—Beliefs on immortality, life and death (pp. 149–158). New York, NY US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group. 18.Jump up ^ Bertolote JM, Fleischmann A, De Leo D, Wasserman D (2004). "Psychiatric diagnoses and suicide: revisiting the evidence". Crisis. 25 (4): 147–55. PMID 15580849. doi:10.1027/0227-5910.25.4.147. 19.Jump up ^ Arsenault-Lapierre G, Kim C, Turecki G (2004). "Psychiatric diagnoses in 3275 suicides: a meta-analysis". BMC Psychiatry. 4: 37. PMC 534107?Freely accessible. PMID 15527502. doi:10.1186/1471-244X-4-37. 20.Jump up ^ Robert B. Cialdini (1993). Influence: the psychology of persuasion. New York: Morrow. p. 336. ISBN 0-688-12816-5. 21.Jump up ^ Hamzelou, J (2009). "Copycat suicides fuelled by media reports.". Newscientist. Retrieved April 21, 2011. 22.Jump up ^ Franklin, D (2009). "Copycat Suicides: What's The Media's Role?". NPR. Retrieved August 1, 2015. 23.^ Jump up to: a b Norris, Bill; Mike Jempson; Lesley Bygrave (September 2001). "Covering suicide worldwide: media responsibilities" (PDF). The MediaWise Trust. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2007-06-14. Retrieved 2007-06-09. 24.Jump up ^ "Suicide". Journalistic standards and practices. CBC/Radio-Canada. Retrieved 2014-02-05. 25.Jump up ^ "Reporting Suicide: Guidance for journalists". The MediaWise Trust, Spanish, French. Retrieved 2007-06-09. 26.Jump up ^ http://www.mediawise.org.uk/suicide/ External links International Association for Suicide Prevention (IASP) – Special Interest Group – Clusters and Contagion in Suicidal Behaviour (Aim of the IASP Special Interest Group (SIG) on Clusters and Contagion in Suicidal Behaviour is to bring together interested people in research, prevention and policy, who can share information and expertise in clusters and contagion effects in suicidal behaviour worldwide). Copycat Effect (Article that discusses the how the sensational coverage of violent events tends to provoke similar events and the journalistic ethics involved). Suicide Contagion and the Reporting of Suicide: Recommendations from a National Workshop – Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report – Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Gregor S, Copycat suicide: The influence of the media 2004, Australian Psychological Society Stack S (2003). "Media coverage as a risk factor in suicide". Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 57 (4): 238–240. doi:10.1136/jech.57.4.238 Source: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copycat_suicide
Suicide
Crisis 911 is the
national emergency number in the United
States. The National
Suicide Prevention Lifeline (http://suicidepreventionlifeline.org/)
is a 24-hour, toll-free, confidential suicide
prevention hotline available to anyone in suicidal
crisis or emotional
distress.[20][21] A 24-hour an
Online
Chat in
partnership with Contact USA[22] is also
available. The
American Foundation for Suicide
Prevention
is a non-profit organization exclusively dedicated
to understanding and preventing suicide through
research, education and advocacy, and to reaching
out to people with mental disorders and those
impacted by suicide."[23] Crisis
Text Line
is the only 24/7, nationwide crisis-intervention
text-message hotline.[24] Samaritans
is a registered charity aimed at providing
emotional support to anyone in distress or at risk
of suicide throughout the United
States[9] The
San Francisco Night Ministry
provides free confidential telephone counseling
between 10 p.m and 4 a.m. Pacific Standard Time to
anyone from any locality. The
Trevor Project
is a nationwide organization that provide crisis
intervention and suicide prevention services to
lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and questioning
youth.[25] The
Veterans Crisis Line
is a suicide-prevention hotline available to United
States military people (both active-duty and
veterans), in suicidal crisis or emotional
distress. The service is confidential, free and
open 24 hours.[26] Trans
Lifeline
is an American organization that provide crisis
intervention and suicide prevention services to
transgender and non-binary individuals. Trans
Lifeline offers service throughout the United
States and Canada. HopeLine
is a suicide prevention and crisis intervention
hotline that can be called or texted. They operate
by using active listening to support and reflect
through any kind of crisis, even if not suicide
related. While they are based in Raleigh, NC, they
serve the entire nation. Other suicide
crisis organizations (http://suicideprevention.wikia.com/wiki/USA). Social
aspects Suicide
types Epidemiology History Related
cALL 800-273-8255 or text "sos" to 741741 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
