Panetta
www.TheCitizensWhoCare.org
|
Leon
Panetta interview with Brian Wilson - Video and
Transcript
Related
issues: Waterboarding,
Geneva
Conventions,
Torture
Leon
Panetta interview with Brian Wilson - Video and
Transcript
This is the interview with Panetta regarding the issue of
Waterboarding and the killing of Osama ben Laden.
Clay Dalrymple said
Leon Panetta "admitted enhanced interrogation was one of the
many ways information was gathered to get bin Laden.
Waterboarding
was a part of the method - not torture." While Bush chose to
remove the U.S. from the Geneva Convention on torture,
nonetheless, waterboarding is seen by the Geneva
Conventions
and most countries as torture. The definition of
torture.
Transcript and video
of an interview with NBC's Brian Williams and
CIA Director Leon Panetta. Starting at 7:50 through
9:40 in focuses on waterboarding. Scroll to
7:50-9:40.
Williams: I'd like to
ask you about the sourcing on the intel that ultimatly led
to this successful attack. Can you confirm that it was as a
result of waterboarding that we learned what we needed to
learn to go after bin Laden.
Panetta: You know,
Brian, in the intelligence business you work from a lot of
sources of information and that was true here. We had a
multiple source, a multiple series of sources that provided
information with regards to this situation. Clearly some of
it came from detainees, interigation of detainees but we
also had information from other sources as well. From
Signent intelligence, from imagry, other sources that we had
assets on the ground, It was a combination of all of that
that ultimately we were able to put together that lead us
to that compound. So, it is a little difficult to say that
it was due just to one source of information that we
got.
Williams: Turned
around the other way, are you denying that waterboarding,
was in part, among the tactics used to extract the
intelligence that led to this successful mission.
Panetta: No I think
that some of the detainees clearly were, they used these
enhanced interigation techniques against some of these
detainees but I'm also saying that, you know, the debate
about whether we would have gotten the same information
through other approaches I think is always is going to be an
open question.
Williams: So, finer
point, one final time, enhanced interigation techniques,
which has always be kind of a handy ufimism in these post
911 years, that it includes waterboarding.
Panetta:
That's correct.
Video
Source: today.msnbc.msn.com/id/42880435/ns/today-today_news/t/cia-chief-waterboarding-aided-bin-laden-raid
CIA chief:
Waterboarding aided bin Laden raid
Attorney general tells Congress that operation into Pakistan
was legal
NBC, msnbc.com and
news services updated 5/3/2011 8:51:07 PM ET
2011-05-04T00:51:07
Intelligence garnered
from waterboarded detainees was used to track down al-Qaida
leader Osama bin Laden and kill him, CIA Chief Leon Panetta
told NBC News on Tuesday. (See
the transcript to determine for yourself if this statement
is true or not. See below how NBC used their own words to
imply - much like FOX News, but FOX actually reformates
the video to say what the interviewees didn't say.
FOX are experts in producing fabricated
videos. You
decide.)
.."Enhanced
interrogation techniques" were used to extract information
that led to the mission's success, Panetta said during an
interview with anchor Brian Williams. Those techniques
included waterboarding, he acknowledged.
Panetta, who in a 2009
CIA confirmation hearing declared "waterboarding is torture
and it's wrong," said Tuesday that debate about its use will
continue.
"Whether we would have
gotten the same information through other approaches I think
is always gonna be an open question," Panetta
said.
"In the intelligence
business you work from a lot of sources of information and
that was true here," Panetta said. "We had a multiple source
a multiple series of sources that provided
information with regards to the situation. Clearly some of
it came from detainees and the interrogation of detainees
but we also had information from other sources as
well."
Panetta's comments
hours after Attorney General Eric Holder defended as lawful
Tuesday the intelligence gathering and raid that resulted in
the death of al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden.
Under questioning by a
committee member, Holder said he did not know whether
information helpful to the search for bin Laden was gained
through harsh interrogation techniques of al-Qaida suspects.
Rep. Dan Lungren,
R-Calif., asked whether the bin Laden mission might have
been illegal if it was aided by legally questionable
interrogation tactics of prisoners at CIA sites around the
globe.
The following is an
exchange between Holder and Lungren during the hearing.
Lungren: "Can you tell
us for the public record whether we can therefore be assured
that any intelligence which led to the capture and killing
of Osama bin Laden was not the result of enhanced
interrogation techniques?"
Holder: "Well I think
that, as has been indicated by other administration
spokesmen, there was a mosaic of sources that led to the
identification of the people that led to ..."
Lungren: "I understand
that, but were any pieces of that mosaic the result of
enhanced interrogation techniques?"
Holder: "I do not
know."
Lungren: "If that were
the case, would it make the action that we took against
Osama bin Laden illegal?"
Holder: "No. I mean, I
think that in terms of the attenuation, to the extent that
it was assumed that that were true, the attenuation between
those acts that might have been problematic and the action
that was taken just two days ago was sufficiently long so
that the action would still be considered legal."
'Controversial
interrogation'
U.S. officials say one
of the key clues that led to bin Laden was a thread of
information about an al-Qaida courier. That thread, they
say, may have come from Sept. 11 mastermind Khalid Sheik
Mohammed or from the so-called 20th hijacker, Mohammad
al-Qahtani.
.Authorities
acknowledge both Khalid Sheik Mohammad and Mohammad
al-Qahtani had been subjected to enhanced interrogation, a
policy authorized by former President George W. Bush.
"We used this
technique on three people, captured a lot of people and used
it on three. We gained value; information to protect the
country. And it was the right thing to do as far as I'm
concerned," Bush said in a 2010 interview.
But was it harsh
interrogation that led to the critical information? The
identity and whereabouts of the courier came to light only
years later, after the enhanced interrogation had
stopped.
"The road to bin Laden
began with waterboarding," Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., House
Homeland Security Chairman, said in an NBC News interview
in which he asserted that waterboarding is a "moral
imperative" that "saves lives."
"I use the example of
Sept 10th, 2001, if we had captured [9/11 airplane
hijacker] Mohammed Atta and we knew he was going to kill
thousands of Americans but we didn't know when or where, are
we saying now you wouldn't hold his head under water to save
3000 lives?"
Critics say there's no
way to know if enhanced interrogation methods led to that
one crucial piece of intelligence.
"To reduce this to the
idea that one piece of fact here or there came from enhanced
interrogation techniques
and their use is
really misleading the American public," said Karen
Greenberg, NYU Center On Law And Security.
Administration
officials say it was multiple sources of intelligence and
years of patient work that eventually led to bin Laden.
"Those who believe
enhanced interrogation techniques are incredibly successful
are going to be out there publicly advocating for why they
work and why we should continue to use them. Others are
going to say, well, they may have worked on this one
occasion, you can't draw a broad sweeping conclusion that
they always work," said Roger Cressey, NBC News terrorism
analyst.
Source:
today.msnbc.msn.com/id/42880435/ns/today-today_news/t/cia-chief-waterboarding-aided-bin-laden-raid/
©2007-2011,
www.TheCitizensWhoCare.org//panetta.html
|
|